Are children capable of evil

That's a very deep question — philosophers, psychologists, teachers and even religious thinkers have wrestled with it for centuries.

Short answer:

Children can do harmful or very cruel things.

But that is not the same as being "evil."

To understand why, we have to separate behavior from moral intention.

1. What "evil" actually means

When adults call someone evil, we usually mean three ingredients:

1. The person understands that an action is wrong
2. They freely choose it anyway
3. They intend harm or feel no moral conflict

A war criminal, a sadistic manipulator, a person who enjoys hurting others — those fit the idea because they possess moral awareness + deliberate cruelty.

The key issue is this:

Children do not yet possess a fully developed moral mind.

Their brains literally aren't finished yet — especially the prefrontal cortex, the part responsible for:

• impulse control
• empathy regulation
• future consequences
• moral reasoning

This area keeps developing into the early 20s.

So when a child does something terrible, the action may look evil — but the mental structure behind it is different.

2. Why children can still be shockingly cruel

You've probably seen this:

kids excluding someone, laughing at pain, or bullying without guilt.

Here's why.

(a) Empathy is learned, not automatic

Babies are not born kind.

They are born self-centred — not selfish in a moral sense, but neurologically egocentric.

Young children literally cannot fully grasp that other people experience feelings as intensely as they do.

To a 5-year-old:

"If I am not hurt, then it isn't serious."

They're not choosing cruelty.

They cannot yet model another person's inner world.

Empathy develops gradually:

• ~4–5 years: recognizes feelings
• ~7–9 years: understands emotional impact
• ~11–14 years: moral responsibility begins stabilizing

(b) Consequences are abstract

Adults imagine future regret.

Children live almost entirely in the present moment.

So a child might:

• push someone off a playground structure
• spread humiliating rumors
• destroy a treasured object

Not because they want suffering —

but because their brain prioritizes curiosity, impulse, attention, or status, and cannot yet simulate the emotional aftermath.

They see:

action → reaction

but not

action → emotional injury → psychological memory → trauma

(c) Moral reasoning develops in stages

Psychology shows children pass through levels:

1. Punishment stage
   "Wrong = I get into trouble"
2. Reward/approval stage
   "Wrong = others disapprove"
3. Principle stage (later adolescence)
   "Wrong = it harms another human being"

Before the last stage, a child can hurt someone while honestly believing:

"I didn't do anything bad — no one caught me."

That's not evil.

That's incomplete moral cognition.

3. What about the rare extreme cases?

Occasionally there are children who commit severe violence. These cases are disturbing because they look indistinguishable from adult malice.

But even in those situations, experts usually find combinations of:

• trauma
• attachment disorder
• neurological impairment
• emotional neglect
• inability to form empathy
• exposure to violence

In other words:

not a fully formed moral agent choosing wickedness,

but a developing mind whose emotional wiring never properly formed.

A child who never experienced secure attachment often never learned that other people are real in the emotional sense.

So harm can occur without the psychological capacity for guilt.

4. The crucial difference

An evil adult:

knows the humanity of others and rejects it.

A harmful child:

has not yet fully discovered the humanity of others.

One is moral corruption.

The other is moral immaturity.

5. Why this matters

If we label children "evil," we misunderstand both justice and education.

Because childhood is precisely the period when:

• empathy can be taught
• conscience can be awakened
• identity can be redirected

Children are not fixed personalities.

They are unfinished moral beings.

A child who bullies at 10 can become a compassionate adult — not despite childhood, but because guidance intervened before the personality crystallized.

A useful way to think about it

Children are less like "small adults"

and more like moral beginners.

They are born with:

• strong impulses
• weak brakes
• incomplete understanding
• intense need for belonging

Goodness is something they gradually learn to construct.

So the honest answer:

Children are capable of cruelty, even terrible harm —

but evil requires a level of conscious moral rejection that a developing mind usually cannot yet reach.

https://chatgpt.com/s/t_699d2e595e14819184f8cea9ce581d04

Sent from my iPhone