Friday, June 18, 2021

Infectious agents and how they cause disease - Immunobiology - NCBI Bookshelf

Infectious agents and how they cause disease - Immunobiology - NCBI Bookshelf

Infectious agents and how they cause disease

Infectious disease can be devastating, and sometimes fatal, to the host. In this part of the chapter we will briefly examine the stages of infection, and the various types of infectious agents.

The process of infection can be broken down into stages, each of which can be blocked by different defense mechanisms. In the first stage, a new host is exposed to infectious particles shed by an infected individual. The number, route, mode of transmission, and stability of an infectious agent outside the host determines its infectivity. Some pathogens, such as anthrax, are spread by spores that are highly resistant to heat and drying, while others, such as the (), are spread only by the exchange of bodily fluids or tissues because they are unable to survive as infectious agents outside the body.

The first contact with a new host occurs through an epithelial surface. This may be the skin or the internal mucosal surfaces of the respiratory, gastro-intestinal, and urogenital tracts. After making contact, an infectious agent must establish a focus of infection. This involves adhering to the epithelial surface, and then colonizing it, or penetrating it to replicate in the tissues (Fig. 10.2, left-hand panels). Many microorganisms are repelled at this stage by . We have discussed the innate immune defense mediated by epithelia and by phagocytes and in the underlying tissues in Chapter 2. Chapter 2 also discusses how are activated in response to intracellular infections, and how a local inflammatory response and induced cytokines and chemokines can bring more effector cells and molecules to the site of an infection while preventing pathogen spread into the blood. These innate immune responses use a variety of germline-encoded receptors to discriminate between microbial and host cell surfaces, or infected and normal cells. They are not as effective as adaptive immune responses, which can afford to be more powerful on account of their . However, they can prevent an infection being established, or failing that, contain it while an develops.

Figure 10.2. Infections and the responses to them can be divided into a series of stages.

Figure 10.2

Infections and the responses to them can be divided into a series of stages. These are illustrated here for an infectious microorganism entering across an epithelium, the commonest route of entry. The infectious organism must first adhere to epithelial (more...)

Only when a microorganism has successfully established a site of infection in the host does disease occur, and little damage will be caused unless the agent is able to spread from the original site of infection or can secrete toxins that can spread to other parts of the body. Extracellular pathogens spread by direct extension of the focus of infection through the lymphatics or the bloodstream. Usually, spread by the bloodstream occurs only after the has been overwhelmed by the burden of infectious agent. Obligate intracellular pathogens must spread from cell to cell; they do so either by direct transmission from one cell to the next or by release into the extracellular fluid and reinfection of both adjacent and distant cells. Many common food poisoning organisms cause pathology without spreading into the tissues. They establish a site of infection on the epithelial surface in the lumen of the gut and cause no direct pathology themselves, but they secrete toxins that cause damage either in situ or after crossing the epithelial barrier and entering the circulation.

Most infectious agents show a significant degree of host , causing disease only in one or a few related species. What determines host specificity for every agent is not known, but the requirement for attachment to a particular cell-surface molecule is one critical factor. As other interactions with host cells are also commonly needed to support replication, most pathogens have a limited host range. The molecular mechanisms of host specificity comprise an area of research known as molecular pathogenesis, which falls outside the scope of this book.

While most microorganisms are repelled by innate host defenses, an initial infection, once established, generally leads to perceptible disease followed by an effective host . This is initiated in the local lymphoid tissue, in response to antigens presented by dendritic cells activated during the course of the innate immune response (Fig. 10.2, third and fourth panels). Antigen-specific effector and -secreting B cells are generated by clonal expansion and differentiation over the course of several days, during which time the induced responses of continue to function. Eventually, -specific T cells and then antibodies are released into the blood and recruited to the site of infection (Fig. 10.2, last panel). A cure involves the clearance of extracellular infectious particles by antibodies and the clearance of intracellular residues of infection through the actions of effector T cells.

After many types of infection there is little or no residual pathology following an effective primary response. In some cases, however, the infection or the response to it causes significant tissue damage. In other cases, such as infection with cytomegalovirus or Mycobacterium tuberculosis, the infection is contained but not eliminated and can persist in a latent form. If the is later weakened, as it is in (), these diseases reappear as virulent systemic infections. We will focus on the strategies used by certain pathogens to evade or subvert adaptive immunity and thereby establish a persistent infection in the first part of Chapter 11.

In addition to clearing the infectious agent, an effective prevents reinfection. For some infectious agents, this protection is essentially absolute, while for others infection is reduced or upon reexposure.

The agents that cause disease fall into five groups: viruses, , fungi, protozoa, and helminths (worms). Protozoa and worms are usually grouped together as parasites, and are the subject of the discipline of parasitology, whereas viruses, bacteria, and fungi are the subject of microbiology. In Fig. 10.3, the classes of microorganisms and parasites that cause disease are listed, with typical examples of each. The remarkable variety of these pathogens has caused the natural selection of two crucial features of adaptive immunity. First, the advantage of being able to recognize a wide range of different pathogens has driven the development of receptors on B and of equal or greater diversity. Second, the distinct habitats and life cycles of pathogens have to be countered by a range of distinct effector mechanisms. The characteristic features of each pathogen are its mode of transmission, its mechanism of replication, its pathogenesis or the means by which it causes disease, and the response it elicits. We will focus here on the immune responses to these pathogens.

Figure 10.3. A variety of microorganisms can cause disease.

Figure 10.3

A variety of microorganisms can cause disease. Pathogenic organisms are of five main types: viruses, bacteria, fungi, protozoa, and worms. Some common pathogens in each group are listed in the column on the right.

Infectious agents can grow in various body compartments, as shown schematically in Fig. 10.4. We have already seen that two major compartments can be defined—intracellular and extracellular. Intracellular pathogens must invade host cells in order to replicate, and so must either be prevented from entering cells or be detected and eliminated once they have done so. Such pathogens can be subdivided further into those that replicate freely in the cell, such as viruses and certain (species of Chlamydia and Rickettsia as well as Listeria), and those, such as the mycobacteria, that replicate in cellular vesicles. can be prevented from entering cells by neutralizing antibodies whose production relies on (see Section 9-14), while once within cells they are dealt with by virus-specific , which recognize and kill the infected cell (see Section 8-21). Intravesicular pathogens, on the other hand, mainly infect macrophages and can be eliminated with the aid of pathogen-specific , which activate infected macrophages to destroy the pathogen (see Section 8-26).

Figure 10.4. Pathogens can be found in various compartments of the body, where they must be combated by different host defense mechanisms.

Figure 10.4

Pathogens can be found in various compartments of the body, where they must be combated by different host defense mechanisms. Virtually all pathogens have an extracellular phase where they are vulnerable to antibody-mediated effector mechanisms. However, intracellular (more...)

Many microorganisms replicate in extracellular spaces, either within the body or on the surface of epithelia. Extracellular are usually susceptible to killing by phagocytes and thus pathogenic species have developed means of resisting engulfment. The encapsulated gram-positive cocci, for instance, grow in extracellular spaces and resist phagocytosis by means of their polysaccharide capsule. This means they are not immediately eliminated by tissue phagocytes on infecting a previously unexposed host. However, if this mechanism of resistance is overcome by opsonization by and specific , they are readily killed after ingestion by phagocytes. Thus, these extracellular bacteria are cleared by means of the humoral (see Chapter 9).

Different infectious agents cause markedly different diseases, reflecting the diverse processes by which they damage tissues (Fig. 10.5). Many extracellular pathogens cause disease by releasing specific toxic products or protein toxins (see Fig. 9.23), which can induce the production of neutralizing antibodies (see Section 9-14). Intracellular infectious agents frequently cause disease by damaging the cells that house them. The specific killing of virus-infected cells by thus not only prevents virus spread but removes damaged cells. The to the infectious agent can itself be a major cause of pathology in several diseases (see Fig. 10.5). The pathology caused by a particular infectious agent also depends on the site in which it grows; Streptococcus pneumoniae in the lung causes pneumonia, whereas in the blood it causes a rapidly fatal systemic illness.

Figure 10.5. Pathogens can damage tissues in a variety of different ways.

Figure 10.5

Pathogens can damage tissues in a variety of different ways. The mechanisms of damage, representative infectious agents, and the common names of the diseases associated with each are shown. Exotoxins are released by microorganisms and act at the surface (more...)

As we learned in Chapter 2, for a pathogen to invade the body, it must first bind to or cross the surface of an epithelium. When the infection is due to intestinal pathogens such as Salmonella typhi, the causal agent of typhoid fever, or Vibrio cholerae, which causes cholera, the occurs in the specialized mucosal associated with the gastrointestinal tract, as described later in this chapter. Some intestinal pathogens even target the of the gut mucosal immune system, which are specialized to transport antigens across the epithelium, as a means of entry.

Many pathogens cannot be entirely eliminated by the . But neither are most pathogens universally lethal. Those pathogens that have persisted for many thousands of years in the human population are highly evolved to exploit their human hosts, and cannot alter their pathogenicity without upsetting the compromise they have achieved with the human . Rapidly killing every host it infects is no better for the long-term survival of a pathogen than being wiped out by the immune response before it has had time to infect another individual. In short, we have learned to live with our enemies, and they with us. However, we must be on the alert at all times for new pathogens and new threats to health. The that causes serves as a warning to mankind that we remain constantly vulnerable to the emergence of new infectious agents.



Sent from my iPhone

Wednesday, June 9, 2021

Paleontology and Creationism Meet but Don’t Mesh - NYTimes.com

Paleontology and Creationism Meet but Don't Mesh - NYTimes.com

Paleontology and Creationism Meet but Don't Mesh

Mark Lyons for The New York Times
A DIFFERENT VIEWPOINT Peter Dodson, left, of the University of Pennsylvania, Michael Foote of the University of Chicago and Jon Todd of the Museum of Natural History in London watching a video at the Creation Museum.

PETERSBURG, Ky. — Tamaki Sato was confused by the dinosaur exhibit. The placards described the various dinosaurs as originating from different geological periods — the stegosaurus from the Upper Jurassic, the heterodontosaurus from the Lower Jurassic, the velociraptor from the Upper Cretaceous — yet in each case, the date of demise was the same: around 2348 B.C.

"I was just curious why," said Dr. Sato, a professor of geology from Tokyo Gakugei University in Japan.

For paleontologists like Dr. Sato, layers of bedrock represent an accumulation over hundreds of millions of years, and the Lower Jurassic is much older than the Upper Cretaceous.

But here in the Creation Museum in northern Kentucky, Earth and the universe are just over 6,000 years old, created in six days by God. The museum preaches, "Same facts, different conclusions" and is unequivocal in viewing paleontological and geological data in light of a literal reading of the Bible.

In the creationist interpretation, the layers were laid down in one event — the worldwide flood when God wiped the land clean except for the creatures on Noah's ark — and these dinosaurs died in 2348 B.C., the year of the flood.

"That's one thing I learned," Dr. Sato said.

The worlds of academic paleontology and creationism rarely collide, but the former paid a visit to the latter last Wednesday. The University of Cincinnati was hosting the North American Paleontological Convention, where scientists presented their latest research at the frontiers of the ancient past. In a break from the lectures, about 70 of the attendees boarded school buses for a field trip to the Creation Museum, on the other side of the Ohio River.

"I'm very curious and fascinated," Stefan Bengtson, a professor of paleozoology at the Swedish Museum of Natural History, said before the visit, "because we have little of that kind of thing in Sweden."

Arnold I. Miller, a professor of geology at the University of Cincinnati and head of the meeting's organizing committee, suggested the trip. "Too often, academics tend to ignore what's going on around them," Dr. Miller said. "I feel at least it would be valuable for my colleagues to become aware not only of how creationists are portraying their own message, but how they're portraying the paleontological message and the evolutionary message."

Since the museum opened two years ago, 750,000 people have passed through its doors, but this was the first large group of paleontologists to drop by. The museum welcomed the atypical guests with the typical hospitality. "Praise God, we're excited to have you here," said Bonnie Mills, a guest service employee.

The scientists received the group admission rate, which included lunch.

Terry Mortenson, a lecturer and researcher for Answers in Genesis, the ministry that built and runs the Creation Museum, said he did not expect the visit to change many minds. "I'm sure for the most part they'll be of a different view from what's presented here," Dr. Mortenson said. "We'll just give the freedom to see what they want to see."

Near the entrance to the exhibits is an animatronic display that includes a girl feeding a carrot to a squirrel as two dinosaurs stand nearby, a stark departure from natural history museums that say the first humans lived 65 million years after the last dinosaurs.

"I'm speechless," said Derek E.G. Briggs, director of the Peabody Museum of Natural History at Yale, who walked around with crossed arms and a grimace. "It's rather scary."

Dr. Mortenson and others at the museum say they look at the same rocks and fossils as the visiting scientists, but because of different starting assumptions they arrive at different answers. For example, they say the biblical flood set off huge turmoil inside the Earth that broke apart the continents and pushed them to their current locations, not that the continents have moved over a few billion years.

"Everyone has presuppositions what they will consider, what questions they will ask," said Dr. Mortenson, who holds a doctorate in the history of geology from Coventry University in England. "The very first two rooms of our museum talk about this issue of starting points and assumptions. We will very strongly contest an evolutionist position that they are letting facts speak for themselves."

The museum's presentation appeals to visitors like Steven Leinberger and his wife, Deborah, who came with a group from the Church of the Lutheran Confession in Eau Claire, Wis. "This is what should be taught even in science," Mr. Leinberger said.

The museum founders placed it in the Cincinnati area because it is within a day's drive of two-thirds of the United States population. The area has also long attracted paleontologists with some of the most fossil-laden rocks in North America, where it is easy along some roadsides to pick up fossils dated to be hundreds of millions of years old. The rocks are so well known that they are called the Cincinnatian Series, representing the stretch of time from 451 million to 443 million years ago.

Many of the paleontologists thought the museum misrepresented and ridiculed them and their work and unfairly blamed them for the ills of society.

"I think they should rename the museum — not the Creation Museum, but the Confusion Museum," said Lisa E. Park, a professor of paleontology at the University of Akron.

"Unfortunately, they do it knowingly," Dr. Park said. "I was dismayed. As a Christian, I was dismayed."

Dr. Bengtson noted that to explain how the few species aboard the ark could have diversified to the multitude of animals alive today in only a few thousand years, the museum said simply, "God provided organisms with special tools to change rapidly."

"Thus in one sentence they admit that evolution is real," Dr. Bengtson said, "and that they have to invoke magic to explain how it works."

But even some who disagree with the information and message concede that the museum has an obvious appeal. "I hate that it exists," said Jason D. Rosenhouse, a mathematician at James Madison University in Virginia and a blogger on evolution issues, "but given that it exists, you can have a good time here. They put on a very good show if you can handle the suspension of disbelief."

By the end of the visit, among the dinosaurs, Dr. Briggs seemed amused. "I like the fact the dinosaurs were in the ark," he said. (About 50 kinds of dinosaurs were aboard Noah's ark, the museum explains, but later went extinct for unknown reasons.)

The museum, he realized, probably changes few beliefs. "But you worry about the youngsters," he said.

Dr. Sato likened the museum to an amusement park. "I enjoyed it as much as I enjoyed Disneyland," she said.

Did she enjoy Disneyland?

"Not very much," she said.

A version of this article appeared in print on June 30, 2009, on page D4 of the New York edition.



Sent from my iPhone